I was so intrigued by Robyn’s post the other day about piracy and questions of morality, that I decided to add in my take on it.
Book piracy=very bad.
Okay, that was easy. The question of whether or not people cheat more now than they used to, whether or not people are less moral … well, that’s so much tougher. I’m sure there are sociologist out there who can study and quantify this kind of thing. I don’t have those resources and it seems to me impossible to actually tell if people are less moral and ethical than they used to be. But the story-teller in me will say this: people crave stories with a strong moral position.
This is an issue I’ve been thinking a lot about lately. Perfect example is the Harry Potter novels. Those books are all about right and wrong. They take a strong stance. They say, unequivocally, it’s wrong to judge people based on the circumstances of their birth. It’s wrong to oppress people who are different that you. It’s wrong to abuse power. The moral position of those books is crystal clear. Yes, the characters may have moments of doubt about their person strength or their abilities, but not about the important stuff. The more I think about it, the more I believe that’s why the books are so well loved. I could make a similar argument about the Twilight books. For all their scary vampire nature, the Cullens are probably the most moral characters around today. Both of these series are popular because readers crave stories with a strong moral compass. We need that. We need to believe that right and wrong are distinguishable and that making the right choice is important.
However, if that were universally true, then this nasty piracy issue wouldn’t be an issue at all. And yet it is. It’s something that’s affected every writer I know. One of the problems is that the internet makes the crime of piracy seem so far removed from the victim. Downloading a book illegally seems like such a small thing. Like it’s not hurting anyone. Just as saying something nasty during an internet flame war may seem small. We’ve all done that, right? A discussion grows heated. Because we’re talking to someone we don’t know personally (and someone who’s not even in the room with you), it’s easy to say things more emphatically. Before we know it, we’ve called John396 a total fracking idiot who doesn’t deserve to be sharing air with the rest of humanity. It seems like a victimless crime to download a book, just like it seems victim to yell at John whom we don’t really know.
Yeah, yeah, I know I’m preaching to the choir here. Based on Robyn’s post, it seems like none of y’all download illegally (and we really, really, really appreciate that). Because even if it seems victimless, it isn’t.
One argument I’ve heard (very often actually) is that published writers are money-grubbing brats. We should just be happy knowing someone has read our books. That should be motivation enough for the hard work we do. The fact that we want to actually make a living at this is just proof of our greed. (I’ve never heard this argument stated quite that way, but that’s the gist of it.)
The truth is (trust me on this), we really are happy when someone reads our books and enjoys them. There is no greater joy . Okay, maybe hugging our kids. But we really love happy, satisfied readers. We also love to eat. And to live in houses.
We are not creatures of pure intellect. We have physical needs. Sure, a lot of us probably would keep writing even if we weren’t paid. But we certainly wouldn’t have time to work at it quite so hard. And it is extremely hard, time consuming work. We don’t get paid that much. (I once calculated how much I made per hour. I wanted to cry. Seriously.)
But lets say, just for argument’s sake that we did live in a world were no authors get paid and were people write books just for the joy of writing. We writers bravely post our books for free on the internet. In this world, the newbie writer J.K.Rowling posts her little book about a boy wizard. Lots of people read it. If my Rowling history is correct, she was teaching school when the first book came out (or at least had completed her schooling to do so … something like that.) So let’s say–since in our new world of free books, she’s not getting paid to write–that she’s a teacher. She gets started on book two in the series. She’s writing in evenings, after a full day teaching (I’ve done that. It’s hard.) So it’s another five years to finish book two. Even if she gets fasters, the books are longer. At five years per book, it’s 2020 before Harry Potter book 7 is released to the internet. Does anyone even care anymore? Maybe. Are the books as good? Maybe. This is all hypothetical, so it’s hard to say. But it makes me sad to imagine her writing them in a world where she wouldn’t get paid to do so.
Does she need the billion U.S. dollars she’s now worth? No, probably not. Did she earn it? Goodness yes! Those books are just stinkin’ amazing. They were worth the $25 a book I paid for them. I’ve bought some of them twice (’cause I briefly lost a couple.) And I’d buy them all again if they were available on Kindle (’cause then my husband would know every time I reread them.)
So what it comes down to is this: I think books are worth what we pay for them. I’m guessing you do to, or you wouldn’t still be reading my post, which turned out to be longer than I meant it to.
Share: