About a year ago I stumbled upon a blog that mentioned a revision technique I found very intriguing. It was something I wanted to try then, but wasn’t conducive to the book I was working on so I shelved the idea. But recently when it came time to do revisions for my next book I read up on the process again. It’s my understanding that the concept was developed by a children’s book author and is presented mostly to workshops for other children’s authors. And while the books I write are a tad longer than a picture book I figured the process was worth a try. Here’s what I did:
Basically you take your manuscript and you shrink it down so that it can be laid out on the floor and all examined at once. I managed to get my 300+ pg manuscript down to 44 shrunken pages. All the text is sort of smushed together so that you can read it enough to see what scene that is, but clearly you wouldn’t want to sit down and read the whole book this way – you’d go blind!

So I sat at the table with my 44pgs of tiny text and got our my highlighters and post-it flags. First I came up with a list of things I wanted to track – like point of view scenes (whose head I’m in in any given scene), action-driven scenes, major plot points, romantic plot points and then I wanted to track where I could add a new subplot I wanted to include. I assigned each of these items either a colored flag or a highlighter and then I went through and marked the entire 44 pgs. It didn’t take more than an hour, I don’t think.
Next I placed all the pages on the floor, 4 rows of paper and I sat back and examined what I saw. Right away I could see areas where I needed to add a more action-driven scene, places where my villain had simply disappeared and long stretches between my romantic plot points. I got out my post-it notes and began tagging the areas with instructions on what to add.
I found places to add that secondary plot line. And as an added bonus, seeing the manuscript shrunk up like that really highlighted the areas where I too much white space. I’m a dialogue-heavy writer anyways, but seeing all the white space clearly revealed scenes that could benefit from another layer of detail and texture.
Frankly the whole process was pretty darn amazing. And I think if time allows I’ll use this technique on future books as well.
So how about you? Have you tried anything new lately? Do you normally like to try new things, like new types of food, new recipes or perhaps a new hairstyle? And fellow writers, what is your revision process like? Any favorite tricks you can share?
To read more about the shrunken manuscript revision technique, visit the following links:
http://kmessner.livejournal.com/9135.html
http://wow-womenonwriting.com/31-FE3-NovelRevision.html
http://sarahmillerbooks.blogspot.com/2008/10/incredible-shrinking-manuscript.html



































































































Sep 16th
2009
6:36 am
Booklover1335 Said:
A very interesting concept. And while I am not a writer, just a reader I can really see the benefits of doing this. I will be interested to see if you think this will end of making this a better book in your opinion.
-
Sep 16th
2009
7:50 am
kristan higgins Said:
I did something similar while revising my fourth book, Robyn…it let me see the forest, not just the trees. Wicked cool! It helped quite a bit, actually. As a writer, I love to try new methods and see if they’ll speak to me. Every once in a while, I find a phrase or a method that sticks.
As for other new things, I always try to buy something I’ve never tried at the supermarket…it doesn’t always work so well. For the record, the pad thai that comes in a box? Not so good.
-
Sep 16th
2009
8:13 am
Sandra Sookoo Said:
Very interesting concept! I might have to try it once this WIP is finished. Usually, I take a few days away then read it over for different things and usually come up lacking in the “why” a character does something. Once I fix that issue, things start to flow better.
Thanks for sharing!
-
Sep 16th
2009
8:15 am
Diana Holquist Said:
Holy cow, Robyn.
I’d need an hour just to find enough highlighters in my mess of a house that weren’t dried out. My revision process of the moment is surfing interesting blogs in order to procrastinate.
I don’t actually recommend it.
-
Sep 16th
2009
8:27 am
Emmanuelle Said:
Wow, I’m impressed
-
Sep 16th
2009
8:30 am
Margo Maguire Said:
I took a workshop once from Margie Lawson, and her technique is similar to this. I haven’t had time to read all the notes from that class, but this sounds amazingly like it. I think that the shrinking aspect is really cool, though. Great idea to be able to see it all at once.
-
Sep 16th
2009
8:58 am
Jennifer August Said:
Wow, great post Robyn, thank you! Very timely, too, as I’m in the midst of killer revisions and needed something different to pull it all together. I’ll give this a try this week!
Looking forward to LH: Book 2!
-
Sep 16th
2009
10:02 am
Shana Said:
Oh my gosh! Just the idea of doing this makes my head swim. But I’m the kind of writer who sits down to research a new book, then after a few hours gets tired of it and decides just to write the first scene and figure out the research later. I’m definitely sort of an ADD writer/reviser.
-
Sep 16th
2009
10:17 am
Rainy Said:
Wow! Are you by nature a Type A personality or is this going against the grain? I ask because I’m Type B and although the concept sounds like fun (I could see myself getting lost in a sea of highlighters), I know myself too well and the organizational aspect of it would overwhelm me. Eventually, I might curl up in a corner somewhere…(I’d put a hassled smiley face here if I knew where to get it!)
When I wrote for newspapers, I tended to over-over research and would have to be careful not to get bogged down. With fiction, I like to jump in, feet first and unfortunately, get mired in muck in the middle because I didn’t do enough organizing. I guess, for me, I need to find a happy medium.
-
Sep 16th
2009
2:22 pm
RobynDeHart Said:
Good tip about the pad thai, Kristan, I love that stuff – from restaurants, that is. And yes, this process was wicked cool.
Booklover, I don’t suppose the book will end out differently b/c of this process – it was just a nice visual way to see what I would have had to figure out eventually.
LOL, Diana, I just love you!
Margo, I’d be interested in taking a peek at those notes if you want to share sometime. I found this whole thing totally fascinating.
Jennifer, let me know if you try this with your revisions and good luck. Right now I’m not feeling so eager for book 2 to come out since I’m neck deep in the revisions, but when this is all over, I’ll definitely be ready. Thanks!
Shana, your writing personality always makes me chuckle – it just seems so wildly different than your regular organized self. I don’t do a whole lot of research before I write either – just enough to get going.
Rainy, well, yeah I might say I’m a type a personality type, but not so much about everything. But with my writing usually I’m pretty structured. And anything that makes you panic like that probably wouldn’t work so well for you.
-
Sep 16th
2009
3:34 pm
Emily McKay Said:
Diana’s comment totally cracked me up. ‘Cause that’s the kind of household I live in too. And in searching for the highlighters, I’d probably find a bunch of places my toddler had used those same highlighters to draw on the wall. And the floor. And my grandmother’s antique buffet. And then I’d have to do a bunch of cleaning to try to get the marker off. Mid-way through cleaning, I’d remember that I’d thrown all the highlighters away for exactly this reason.
Now, I’m tired just thinking about it.
But seriously, I think as writers it’s so important for us to try new things. We never know when we’re going to stumble on something fantastic. Besides, it’s really dangerous for us to think, “This is my process. This is the only way I can do it.”
That’s probably a dangerous way of thinking about anything.
-
Sep 16th
2009
4:55 pm
Nancy Robards Thompson Said:
Robyn, this sounds so cool! I’m always open to trying new things when I write/revise. I have my tried-and-true methods – such as storyboarding before I even sit down to write. But I think it keeps the process fresh when you stay open to new things. I will definitely try this the next time I’m ready to revise. Thanks for sharing.
Oh, and Kristan, I’m totally with you on the box Pad Thai. Two thumbs down!
-
Sep 16th
2009
11:23 pm
Linda Henderson Said:
Well, I’m not a writer but I do like to try new things. Lately I’ve been trying my hand at sewing. I’m not very good at it and I can’t say I really find it very relaxing.
-
Sep 17th
2009
1:10 pm
KathrynSmith Said:
Interesting technique, Robyn! Not sure I’d have the patience for it. However, I’m very big on plotting and outlining at the beginning. I’ve just bought some sticky notes to try doing some story boarding-type exercises. Always looking for new things to try!
Oh, and I downloaded a demo of Microsoft Onenote and I think I’m going to have to buy it. I can organize research and notes into one large file on my computer. It organizes by tabs, so it’s like having an open notebook on hand as I work! Love it, love it, love it.
-