• Kristan Higgins’s All I Ever Wanted hit the USA Today Bestseller List!
  • Our blog has a Facebook page!
  • Kristan Higgins’s Too Good to be True won the 2010 RITA for Best Single Title Contemporary Romance.
  • Katherine Garbera’s The Pirate is being excerpted in this month’s edition of Cosmo as their Red Hot Read.
  • Robyn DeHart’s Seduce Me won the RomCon Readers Crown for Best Short Historical.
  • Teri Brisbin’s The Conqueror’s Lady and A Storm of Passion are both finalists in the 2010 RomCon Readers’ Crown contest.
  • Kathryn Smith’s When Marrying a Scoundrel is a Top Pick from Romantic Times.
  • Robyn DeHart’s Seduce Me is the Romantic Times Reviewers Choice Award winner for Best Historical Romantic Adventure.
  • Janette Kenny’s Innocent in the Italian’s Possession made the USA Today Bestseller List.
  • The Next Best Thing by Kristan Higgins is on Bookpage’s Best Books of 2010.

Damaged characters by Tracy Grant

Tracy Please give a warm Jaunty welcome to Tracy Grant, who is visiting today to talk about damaged characters!  (And she’s giving away a signed book to one lucky commenter!)

No, I’m not talking about the damage an author can inflict with one too many rounds of revising (though that would make an interesting blog topic in and of itself). I’m thinking of characters who are damaged by their past experiences, whether it’s a painful childhood, battlefield trauma, the morally ambiguous life of a spy, or a love affair gone tragically wrong.

Most of my favorite characters, as a reader and a writer, are damaged one way or another. Francis Crawford of Lymond begins his adventures in Dorothy Dunnett’s the Lymond Chronicles already an outlaw and an attainted traitor, estranged from his family and guilty over his sister’s death. Damerel, the hero of one of my favorite Georgette Heyer novels, Venetia, is a social outcast thanks to the scandals in his past. He’s convinced he’ll make Venetia miserable by dragging her into social ruin if he marries her. Venetia has to go to great (and very entertaining) lengths to convince him otherwise.

Lymond and Damerel are wonderful examples of the classic tortured hero. Both are uniquely themselves. Both have a complex backstory, which I think is one of the keys to doing tortured characters well (there’s nothing more annoying than a character who’s tortured over a deep dark secret that seems common place when revealed). But while traditionally it’s the hero who’s suffered the most emotional damage, I’ve always liked heroines with emotional baggage. Barbara Childe, the edgy, self-destructive heroine from Heyer’s An Infamous Army, is a wonderful example of the type.

It can be particularly interesting when both the hero and heroine have emotional scars. I just finished Laurie King’s latest (quite wonderful) Mary Russell & Sherlock Holmes book, The Language of Bees. In this series King took Holmes, who has suffered plenty of damage (some shown, some hinted at) in the original Arthur Conan Doyle stories, and pared him with the much younger but equally scarred Russell. One of the delights of the series is watching these two people, who both guard themselves carefully, reveal bits of their scarred pasts to each other and to the reader. There’s something particularly heartening about two damaged people being able to form a bond (the declaration scene in A Monstrous Regiment of Women is one of the most wonderful I have ever read). And of course, the bond doesn’t heal all the damage, which makes for interesting developments over a series. The previous book in the series, Locked Rooms, dealt with Russell coming to terms with the events surrounding her family’s death. In The Language of Bees, Holmes comes face to face with the “lovely, lost son” King referred to in a previous book and with a painful past that goes back to Irene Adler.

Beneath a Silent MoonIt’s perhaps no wonder that as a writer I can be quite merciless in weighing my own characters down with emotional baggage. When I first began sketching out Charles & Mélanie Fraser, the married Napoleonic Wars spies in my series, I knew that the secrets of Mélanie’s past would create plenty of angst for both of them. But it never occurred to me to stop there. Before I even had the plot of Secrets of a Lady (formerly Daughter of the Game) worked out, I had given Charles a tragic love past affair, an emotionally neglectful childhood, a strained relationship with his brother, and questions about his legitimacy. Secrets of a Lady While Mélanie had suffered the horrors of the Peninsular War and lost both her parents and her younger sister. Quite a bit of that is mentioned or at least alluded to in the first scene between them in Secrets/Daughter. I wanted to show the damage these two people had suffered and the stable marriage they’d managed to build in spite it. To me, that made it all the worse when the very foundations of that marriage are threatened. All of that past damage also provides rich fodder for subsequent books in the series. Charles’s relationship with his family, particularly his father, was the starting place for Beneath a Silent Moon. And there’s lots more to deal with in Mélanie’s past…

Do you like stories about damaged characters? Do you prefer it to be the hero or the heroine or both to have the emotional scars? Any favorite examples to suggest?

Tracy is giving away a signed copy of either Secrets or Beneath to a lucky commenter!

22 Comments
Leave a Comment
Filed in: Jaunty Guests

Comments

  1. [...] May update: I’m guest blogging today on Jaunty Quills about Damaged Characters. Do stop by and comment. [...]

    - Reply
  2. Booklover1335 Said:

    Damaged characters are always my favorite to read, because truthfully we all have some sort of emotional baggage, and it’s nice to see how they resolve the issues to find their HEA.

    One of my most recent reads where both characters were damaged was Lora Leigh’s Wild Card. This has to be one of my alltime fav reads. The hero is so tortured, and what he puts his “wife” through” before he “claims” her had me in tears several times. LOVE this type of book!

    - Reply
  3. kristan higgins Said:

    I like tortured characers, too. As Booklover says, we’re all damaged on some level. But I don’t like characters who use their pasts to justify bad behavior today. That’s just not cool.

    - Reply
  4. anne Said:

    Damaged characters are more realistic and human since no one escapes having problems or neuroses. One that was memorable was Fiona Finnegan from the novel The Tea Rose.

    - Reply
  5. eap Said:

    I prefer if the heroine have the emotional scars for some reason.

    - Reply
  6. Shana Said:

    My current wip has a damaged hero. boy, it is hard to write! I don’t want him to come across as too feminine or weak. It’s definitely a balance.

    - Reply
  7. Margay Said:

    I think damaged characters are more interesting to read about because we all have flaws and it’s nice to know we’re not alone. Who wants to read about perfect people, anyhow? :wink:

    Margay

    - Reply
  8. RobynDeHart Said:

    Good point, Shana, it is a delicate balance to pull off a tortured backstory without allowing the characters to be jerks.

    I think the most memorable damaged character I read is Kate from Catherine Anderson’s Coming Up Roses – it’s out of print now, but if you can get your hands on it, do, it’s wonderful. Oh and Will from LaVyrle Spencer’s Morning Glory. Oh and just about any of the character’s from Pam Morsi’s historicals. *sigh* now I’m feeling all nostalgic of books I haven’t read in ages.

    Thanks for joining us again, Tracy.

    - Reply
  9. ellie Said:

    Characters with issues whose lives are interesting and influenced by their past are fascinating. Reading about them is wonderful and the heroine can overcome a great deal in these stories. An unforgettable heroine is from Isabel’s Daughter, Avery James.

    - Reply
  10. Quilt Lady Said:

    I love characters that are flaw or damaged. Most people have something in their past that they don’t talk about. So no one is really perfect. I don’t want my books to be perfect. We don’t live in a perfect world so I want my characters to be flawed or damaged.

    - Reply
  11. Tracy Grant Said:

    Booklover, I think that’s a great way of putting it! Everyone has some sort of emotional baggage, and seeing characters work their way past that emotional baggage to a happy ending makes the ending that much more powerful.

    Kristan, I totally agree about characters not using their past to justify bad behavior. I find that incredibly annoying, as I find it annoying when characters wallow in their past (and writing characters who are tortured without wallowing can be walking a fine line).

    Anne, I keep hearing great things about the The Tea Rose. Definitely a book I should seek out!

    - Reply
  12. Tracy Grant Said:

    Eap, like heroines with emotional scars as well, as I mentioned. I think for me it’s perhaps because it’s more often the hero who has the most baggage, so it’s an interesting reversal. Also, I tend to like heroines with a past better than sheltered heroines. I realized after the blog was posted that I should have mentioned Harriet Vane. She’s perhaps my favorite damaged heroine. So damaged it takes her three books to heal. Peter Wimsey has his own emotional baggage has well, which is makes their love story very interesting.

    Shana, good point. Showing the damage a character has suffered with out making them seem weak is another thing that can be hard to balance (I have a tendency to write my characters as so stiff upper lip you can’t see the emotion at all :-) . One thing I think works well is to write the character trying *not* to show the damage to other people. That somehow brings the damage to the fore, without the character wallowing or seeming weak.

    Margay, I so agree–I find perfect characters boring, and there’s a lamentable lack of conflict.

    - Reply
  13. RachieG Said:

    Damaged characters are so more realistic to actual people…Honestly, who isn’t a little damaged???

    Great to read about a writer writing realistically about people!! So many have the super hot guy and the perfect woman…and bam suddenly they love eachother.

    Keep up the great work!! :D

    - Reply
  14. Tracy Grant Said:

    Robyn, I loved Morning Glory. Actually Ellie was pretty damaged to. From that opening scene where she serves Will breakfast, and he’s so happy to have real, good food, I desperately wanted the two of them to have a happy ending.

    Ellie, I love plots in which the past influences present events (I pretty much always write books in which the back story plays an important role).

    Good point, Quilt Lady. Those past secrets (a heightened version of the secrets we all carry around, as you say) can make for great drama and conflict. And I think it’s the connection with the past hurts we all have that gives us empathy for such characters.

    - Reply
  15. Solveig Said:

    I LOVE damaged characters :Ö) I just finished reading To beguile a beast where the main character, Sir Alistair, is damaged both in appearance and in his soul, it was glorious :Ö) It makes the happy ending even better

    - Reply
  16. catslady Said:

    It can be either the hero or the heroine or both at the same time. I think it makes a character more believeable because don’t we all have scars of some kind?

    - Reply
  17. Tracy Grant Said:

    Solveig, I think it can be very interesting when inner damage is reflected by physical scars. That’s definitely true of Mary Russell, who I mentioned in the post. The car accident that killed her family left her with physical scars, and she acquires more scars in the course of a traumatic event in the first book in the series (The Beekeeper’s Apprentice).

    Catslady, I so agree–characters with baggage and flaws seem much more human and believable!

    - Reply
  18. Anne Said:

    Thank you for visiting with us, Tracy!!! I love damaged characters — and I don’t mind which or both have the damage. So nice to see them get their happy endings!!! :smile:

    - Reply
  19. Fedora Said:

    Hi, Tracy, like many of the earlier commenters, I do enjoy damaged characters–often I feel I can better relate because they’re imperfect and more real and human in having pasts and weaknesses and/or failings. And of course, seeing them overcome this gives us hope for our own imperfect selves!

    - Reply
  20. Tracy Grant Said:

    Thank you all for having me, Anne! This is a wonderful place to hang out. You’ve hit on one of the reasons I love reading about damaged characters–it makes the happy ending that much more powerful, because these are people you really root for and worry about. That’s why I think declaration scenes between damaged characters are so powerful and satisfying–like the one I mentioned from the Russell & Holmes series, or the end of Barbara Hambly’s Darwath Trilogy, or Harriet Vane finally letting herself accept Peter Wimsey…

    Fedora, I think the fact that those happy endings gives us hope for ourselves is another reason they’re so satisfying!

    - Reply
  21. [...] Trek, The Language of Bees, The X-Files, Tracy Grant No Comments  I blogged recently on both Jaunty Quills and History Hoydens about Damaged Characters. By which, as I said, I wasn’t talking about the [...]

    - Reply
  22. Rona Panama Said:

    Thank you very much for your help, this has been a great relief from the books,

    - Reply

Leave a Comment

Comment a lot? Register here. Already registered? Login here.
Want your own gravatar? Get one here.

New Releases


Older Releases

Mammoth Book of Time Travel Romance Cover Dec 09

stormofpassion

Merry Christmas Cowboy-cvr

When Seducing a Duke

Taken by the Laird

A Cowboy Christmas

An Angel in Provence


Future Guests


Recent Posts


Links


Archives

By Category:

By Month:





Meta

Subscribe:

Register: