
My dearest Readers,
So today, it is my turn to post. And I didn’t even know it!!! Le sigh. I must admit, as of late, I have the memory of an ant. Though at this point, I think an ant has a better memory than I do… I apologize for myself and promise to give everyone a much better post the next time around.
That said, because I haven’t yet shared my new cover for my next upcoming release…I give thee…the cover for the second book in my School of Gallantry Series, THE LORD OF PLEASURE that will be out this August. Forgive its unimpressive size. I tried to blow it up, but it got all blurry…grumble, grumble…
You can see the full monty, however, at my website www.DelilahMarvelle.com.
Covers. Ah yes. They are always *so* much fun for an author to get. It’s like being pregnant for 9 months and not knowing whether you’re going to get a boy or a girl or an…alien. I’ve been pretty dang fortunate with all the covers I’ve received thus far, but being the type of person that I am, I intend to “strip” the cover down for you, Delilah Marvelle style.
Here is what went through my head when I got my cover:
Oooo…red.
OMGod…look at his chest!!! It takes up half the cover. But that’s good. That’s very good (despite what my husband thinks). Chests sell. Wait…his nipples are hard. Is he cold? He’s supposed to be hot, dang it, not cold!
Shirts really didn’t open up like that in 1830. So much for my historical detail. Le sigh. At least there’s a ruffle on the sleeve which indicates it’s historical. Or at least I hope it does…
Thank goodness they didn’t show his entire face. I wanted Beckham on the cover and while the man on the cover is very, very nice, he isn’t Beckham.
And what is with that colonial bed???? There isn’t a single scene throughout the entire story that showcases a bed (yet alone a colonial one). My characters are quite unconventional, thank you very much, and don’t require the use of a bed. But hey, it gets the point across. Man. Chest. Bed. I’m happy.
So…what are your thought on my cover? Be honest people….I promise I won’t cry. I also would love to hear what you love to see on covers and what you *hate* to see on covers.
Me? I’ll give it plain. I love it when you can’t see their entire faces. It leaves more to the imagination. A LOT MORE. What do I hate? When the book is historical but the cover looks contemporary. You have no idea how many good books I’ve skimmed past because I thought it was contemporary….
So until next time (which I promise will be more entertaining),
Cheers and much love,
Delilah Marvelle



























































































Feb 26th
2009
12:14 pm
catslady Said:
It’s a great cover!!! (Maybe he wasn’t cold but turned on lol). Historicals are my favorite so I too look for those kind of covers. My favorite is not showing the whole face – I want to imagine it my way. And a naked chest is always a plus. I hate when they get the hair color wrong because that ought to be a simple thing to get right. I still think authors should have more say about their books – covers and titles.
-
Feb 26th
2009
12:40 pm
Carol Luciano Said:
Love the cover, it looks, or should I say he looks great. I have to agree with Catslady, I think he was turned on. lol lol
It works for me. And it could be he was ripping his shirt off.
cAROL l.
-
Feb 26th
2009
4:01 pm
Shirley Karr Said:
Ooh, yes, he … I mean the cover … is yummy. And I too try not to get hung up on historically incorrect details. We didn’t have zippers until after 1900, so is that a button flap on his trousers?
Check your e-mail D — I’ll send you my favorite chest pic.
-
Feb 26th
2009
4:12 pm
Shirley Karr Said:
PS: Just noticed that they must have flipped the image, because the flap is on the wrong side.
Going to stop staring and go back to work now…
-
Feb 26th
2009
5:15 pm
Delilah Marvelle Said:
Catslady,
. You never quite see those on romance novels. That would be something new for a cover.
LOL about him being turned on. But if he has the hard nipples due to being turned on…ehm…where is the stick in the trousers? We might as well be accurate here…:mrgreen: . And take over the art departments, woman!!! Yes and amen, authors should totally have more say on their covers!
Carol,
I never thought of it that way, him ripping his shirt in half. That’s absolutely brilliant! Ripped shirts, hard nipples. Heck, all that’s missing is… that stick in the trousers. Like I was telling Catslady,
Shirley,
Did you blow up my cover and star at his trousers, you naughty thing you!!! BTW, I’m still waiting for my e-mail. Where that picture you promised me?
-
Feb 26th
2009
6:15 pm
Jane Said:
Hi Delilah,
I love the cover. Can’t wait to read Hawksford’s story.
-
Feb 26th
2009
6:28 pm
Delilah Marvelle Said:
Jane,
Hawksford is much rowdier than the cover gives him credit for…if that is even possible…
I am so thrilled you love the cover! Yay! And I’m even more thrilled to hear you’re looking forward to Hawksford’s story
-
Feb 26th
2009
8:38 pm
RobynDeHart Said:
It’s a great cover, Delilah. I agree I like the trend toward the half heads and I like rich details like the bed they’ve included on yours.
-
Feb 26th
2009
10:05 pm
Emily McKay Said:
I love it!
And like you, I love the half-faces. Lori Foster had a cover that was just the guy’s jaw. I must have picked that up twenty times. Never bought it ’cause the story line didn’t appeal to me, but I swear I read the back cover copy every time I went to barnes and noble for like six months.
But seriously. It’s a fantastic cover!
-
Feb 26th
2009
11:35 pm
Anna Said:
I do *not* judge historical details on the covers of historical books. The point is to catch my eye so I pick it off the shelf, flip it over to the backside where I can read the blurb, then maybe flip inside a little bit before deciding whether or not to buy it. I think a truly fabulous cover is a bonus for the author, but covers change in editions anyway. I hate it when I think the best thing about a book is the cover. No matter how pretty the cover of the author’s next book, I won’t be purchasing it.
I think you have a wonderful cover, Delilah! Can’t wait to get between it.
-
Feb 27th
2009
11:05 am
Delilah Marvelle Said:
Robyn,
Thanks on the cover and I’m with you that trend. So loving it!
Emily,
Thank you!!! And it’s funny you say that about Lori Foster’s cover. I had that happen to me with another cover. You keep picking it up, you know it’s not something you’ll ever read, but you *have* to pick it up!
Anna,
LOL about the best thing about the book being the cover. Now THAT no one wants.
-
Feb 27th
2009
5:18 pm
Fedora Said:
Delilah, that cover is very eye-catching! Total yum, even if it’s historically inaccurate and all that!
I’d totally pick it up! (That’s the point, right? How pathetic I am, to have my head turned so easily by a pretty chest…)
-
Feb 27th
2009
6:19 pm
ChariDee Said:
The chest is verra nice. But I just can’t wait for what’s inside the cover! I want the book NOW!!!!
-
Feb 28th
2009
2:17 am
Delilah Marvelle Said:
Fedora,
Pathetic? Neva! Heck, pretty chests are well worth turning one’s head for…believe me. I turn my head quite often, LOL.
ChariDee,
Yes, the chest *is* verra, verra nice. And wow! Talk about making me feel like a gazillion bucks!!! Grin. If you really, really wanna get a chance to read the first three chapters of Lord of Pleasure for free, I’ll be sending out a free pdf to everyone signed up for my naughty but fun newsletter. That particular newsletter with the free chapters will be going out on April 1st (no joke). You can find it on my gossip page. Thanks for posting AND the huge compliment!!! You rock.
-